Pillar 03 · Accessibility & Compliance

ADA RISK,
HANDLED PROPERLY.

Real WCAG 2.1 AA remediation — not an overlay widget that courts have repeatedly refused to accept as a defense.

Apr 2027
ADA Title II WCAG 2.1 AA deadline for larger public entities
DOJ rule, extended April 2026
Apr 2028
Deadline for smaller entities and special district governments
DOJ rule, extended April 2026
WCAG
2.1 AA
The standard courts and regulators actually measure you against
The benchmark I work to
Why This Matters Now

THE ONE THING
YOU CAN'T HAND
TO SOFTWARE.

Most web work is getting easier. This part is getting harder, and the stakes are going up rather than down.

Web accessibility lawsuits against private businesses run into the thousands every year, and they overwhelmingly target small and mid-sized companies — not because those businesses did anything malicious, but because their sites are easy to test and expensive to defend. Separately, the Department of Justice's ADA Title II rule sets hard WCAG 2.1 AA deadlines of April 2027 and April 2028. If you contract with a school district, a city, a county, or any public entity, that deadline lands on you too.

Here is why this is the pillar that AI does not erode: what you are actually buying is someone who takes responsibility. A model can flag a missing alt attribute. It cannot sit across from your lawyer and explain what was tested, what was fixed, and why the remaining items were judged acceptable. That signature is the product.

I have already built and shipped this work — a full WCAG 2.1 AA remediation for a healthcare practice, done as a proper attribute-level fix in the theme rather than a bolt-on script.

Read This Before You Buy Anything

OVERLAY WIDGETS
DON'T WORK.

You have probably seen the ads: drop in one line of JavaScript, get an accessibility badge, sleep soundly. It is a tempting offer and it does not hold up.

Overlay tools have been named in hundreds of ADA lawsuits — in many cases the widget itself became evidence that the business knew about the problem and chose a cosmetic fix. Major disability advocacy organizations have publicly rejected them, and thousands of accessibility professionals have signed statements against their use.

The reason is simple. An overlay sits on top of broken markup and tries to guess intent at runtime. It cannot know that your unlabeled button submits a contact form. The barrier is still there for the person using a screen reader — you just stopped being able to see it.

I fix the markup itself. It takes longer, it costs more than $49 a month, and it actually works.

How It Works

THE PROCESS.

Audit first, then fix, then keep it from drifting back.

01

Automated scan — the cheap 30%

I start where the tools are genuinely good: contrast failures, missing alt attributes, malformed ARIA, form fields with no label. This catches roughly a third of real issues and it costs almost nothing to run.

02

Manual testing — the other 70%

Then I do the part software cannot. Navigate your entire site by keyboard only. Run it through a screen reader. Check that focus order makes sense, that modals trap focus properly, that your menu works without a mouse. This is where the lawsuit-grade problems actually live.

03

Fix the markup, in your theme

Real remediation: proper semantic structure, skip links, visible focus indicators, correct ARIA, meaningful alt text written by a person who looked at the image. No overlay, no script that papers over the problem at runtime.

04

Document everything

You get a written report: what was tested, what was found, what was fixed, and an honest note on anything still outstanding and why. This is the document that matters if you ever receive a demand letter.

05

Publish an accessibility statement

A public statement on your site describing your conformance level and giving people a way to report barriers. It is required by some standards, it is good practice everywhere, and it demonstrably helps demonstrate good faith.

06

Keep it from decaying

This is the part people skip. Every new blog post, image, and plugin update can reintroduce problems. Compliance is a state you maintain, not a certificate you earn once — which is exactly why the monthly plan exists.

AN HONEST CAVEAT

Nobody can make you lawsuit-proof, and I will not pretend otherwise. There is no government certification for private business websites, and a determined plaintiff can file regardless. What genuine remediation does is remove the actual barriers, dramatically reduce the surface area a tester can find, and give you documented evidence of good-faith effort. That is a materially different position than doing nothing — but it is not a force field, and you should be wary of anyone who says it is.

Pricing

AUDIT, THEN
MAINTAIN.

Most clients start with the audit and move onto Compliance Care once the fixes are in.

Project
Audit & Remediation
A real audit of your actual pages, then the fixes — done by hand, in your theme.
$1,500+
One-time · scoped to your site size
  • Manual WCAG 2.1 AA audit, not just a scan
  • Keyboard and screen-reader testing
  • Hands-on remediation of what we find
  • Alt text, focus states, ARIA, contrast, forms
  • Written compliance report you can hand a lawyer
  • Accessibility statement drafted for your site
Get a Quote →

Already on a Website Care plan? Compliance Care is $145/mo bundled.

Common Questions

FAIR
QUESTIONS.

Does the ADA actually apply to my website? +
For most businesses serving the public, courts have widely treated websites as covered under ADA Title III, and thousands of web accessibility suits are filed every year — mostly against small and mid-sized companies. If you work with any public entity, ADA Title II adds firm WCAG 2.1 AA deadlines in April 2027 and April 2028.
Won't an accessibility widget handle this for $49/mo? +
No. Overlay widgets have been named in hundreds of ADA lawsuits, and disability advocacy organizations broadly reject them. They sit on top of broken markup and guess at intent — the barriers remain for anyone using a screen reader. In several cases the widget became evidence against the business.
What standard do you work to? +
WCAG 2.1 Level AA. That is the standard named in the ADA Title II rule and the benchmark used in most settlement agreements, so it is the one worth measuring against.
Can you guarantee I won't get sued? +
No, and be careful with anyone who says they can. There is no government certification for private business websites and a determined plaintiff can file regardless. What real remediation does is remove the actual barriers and give you documented evidence of good-faith effort — a materially better position, but not a force field.
How long does an audit take? +
Typically one to three weeks depending on how many unique page templates you have. A five-page brochure site is quick. A site with a store, a booking flow, and a members area takes longer, because each of those has to be tested by hand.
My site isn't WordPress. Can you still do this? +
Yes. Accessibility work is about markup and behavior, not platform. I have done this on WordPress, custom builds, and hosted platforms. The audit is identical; only the remediation method changes.
Not Sure Where to Start?

TALK TO A HUMAN
FIRST.

30 minutes with Dan. No sales script, no call center, no outsourcing. I will tell you honestly whether this is worth your money — including when the answer is no.